2efa33f81e
At least one system (a Geode system with a Digital Logic BIOS) has been found which suddenly stops reporting the SMAP signature when reading the E820 memory chain. We can't know what, exactly, broke in the BIOS, so if we detect this situation, declare the E820 data unusable and fall back to E801. Also, revert to original behavior of always probing all memory methods; that way all the memory information is available to the kernel. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com> Cc: Joerg Pommnitz <pommnitz@yahoo.com>
116 lines
2.2 KiB
C
116 lines
2.2 KiB
C
/* -*- linux-c -*- ------------------------------------------------------- *
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 1991, 1992 Linus Torvalds
|
|
* Copyright 2007 rPath, Inc. - All Rights Reserved
|
|
*
|
|
* This file is part of the Linux kernel, and is made available under
|
|
* the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.
|
|
*
|
|
* ----------------------------------------------------------------------- */
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* arch/i386/boot/memory.c
|
|
*
|
|
* Memory detection code
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include "boot.h"
|
|
|
|
#define SMAP 0x534d4150 /* ASCII "SMAP" */
|
|
|
|
static int detect_memory_e820(void)
|
|
{
|
|
int count = 0;
|
|
u32 next = 0;
|
|
u32 size, id;
|
|
u8 err;
|
|
struct e820entry *desc = boot_params.e820_map;
|
|
|
|
do {
|
|
size = sizeof(struct e820entry);
|
|
id = SMAP;
|
|
asm("int $0x15; setc %0"
|
|
: "=am" (err), "+b" (next), "+d" (id), "+c" (size),
|
|
"=m" (*desc)
|
|
: "D" (desc), "a" (0xe820));
|
|
|
|
/* Some BIOSes stop returning SMAP in the middle of
|
|
the search loop. We don't know exactly how the BIOS
|
|
screwed up the map at that point, we might have a
|
|
partial map, the full map, or complete garbage, so
|
|
just return failure. */
|
|
if (id != SMAP) {
|
|
count = 0;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
count++;
|
|
desc++;
|
|
} while (next && count < E820MAX);
|
|
|
|
return boot_params.e820_entries = count;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int detect_memory_e801(void)
|
|
{
|
|
u16 ax, bx, cx, dx;
|
|
u8 err;
|
|
|
|
bx = cx = dx = 0;
|
|
ax = 0xe801;
|
|
asm("stc; int $0x15; setc %0"
|
|
: "=m" (err), "+a" (ax), "+b" (bx), "+c" (cx), "+d" (dx));
|
|
|
|
if (err)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
/* Do we really need to do this? */
|
|
if (cx || dx) {
|
|
ax = cx;
|
|
bx = dx;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (ax > 15*1024)
|
|
return -1; /* Bogus! */
|
|
|
|
/* This ignores memory above 16MB if we have a memory hole
|
|
there. If someone actually finds a machine with a memory
|
|
hole at 16MB and no support for 0E820h they should probably
|
|
generate a fake e820 map. */
|
|
boot_params.alt_mem_k = (ax == 15*1024) ? (dx << 6)+ax : ax;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int detect_memory_88(void)
|
|
{
|
|
u16 ax;
|
|
u8 err;
|
|
|
|
ax = 0x8800;
|
|
asm("stc; int $0x15; setc %0" : "=bcdm" (err), "+a" (ax));
|
|
|
|
boot_params.screen_info.ext_mem_k = ax;
|
|
|
|
return -err;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int detect_memory(void)
|
|
{
|
|
int err = -1;
|
|
|
|
if (detect_memory_e820() > 0)
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (!detect_memory_e801())
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (!detect_memory_88())
|
|
err = 0;
|
|
|
|
return err;
|
|
}
|