android_kernel_xiaomi_sm7250/Documentation/process
Akira Yokosawa f72ac3d535 docs: submitting-patches: Fix crossref to 'The canonical patch format'
commit 6d5aa418b3bd42cdccc36e94ee199af423ef7c84 upstream.

The reference to `explicit_in_reply_to` is pointless as when the
reference was added in the form of "#15" [1], Section 15) was "The
canonical patch format".
The reference of "#15" had not been properly updated in a couple of
reorganizations during the plain-text SubmittingPatches era.

Fix it by using `the_canonical_patch_format`.

[1]: 2ae19acaa5 ("Documentation: Add "how to write a good patch summary" to SubmittingPatches")

Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Fixes: 5903019b2a ("Documentation/SubmittingPatches: convert it to ReST markup")
Fixes: 9b2c76777a ("Documentation/SubmittingPatches: enrich the Sphinx output")
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.9+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/64e105a5-50be-23f2-6cae-903a2ea98e18@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-06-06 08:24:22 +02:00
..
1.Intro.rst
2.Process.rst
3.Early-stage.rst
4.Coding.rst
5.Posting.rst
6.Followthrough.rst
7.AdvancedTopics.rst
8.Conclusion.rst
adding-syscalls.rst
applying-patches.rst
changes.rst
clang-format.rst
code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst
code-of-conduct.rst
coding-style.rst
conf.py
development-process.rst
email-clients.rst
howto.rst
index.rst
kernel-docs.rst
kernel-driver-statement.rst
kernel-enforcement-statement.rst
license-rules.rst
magic-number.rst
maintainer-pgp-guide.rst
management-style.rst
stable-api-nonsense.rst
stable-kernel-rules.rst
submit-checklist.rst
submitting-drivers.rst
submitting-patches.rst docs: submitting-patches: Fix crossref to 'The canonical patch format' 2022-06-06 08:24:22 +02:00
volatile-considered-harmful.rst